Skip to content
Codenotary
All posts

Guardian vs OpenSCAP: A Comparative Analysis

When it comes to ensuring the security and compliance of your systems, choosing the right tool can make a significant difference in both efficiency and resource usage. This blog post explores the benefits of using Codenotary's Guardian compared to OpenSCAP-based solutions, providing insights into their functionalities and performance.

Introducing the solutions

Guardian

Guardian is a modern security and compliance platform designed to provide seamless, automated attestation and monitoring of systems. As an AI-driven vulnerability management software designed to enhance the security of Linux systems, it provides clear visibility into vulnerabilities affecting Linux systems (including live-patching and extended security support), enabling effective prioritization of remediation actions.

Key Features:

  • Intuitive Interface: The platform includes a straightforward web dashboard where users can view detailed summaries of assets and associated risks. This allows for a focused approach to identifying vulnerabilities, potential exploits, and available solutions.

  • AI-Powered Risk Prioritization: Guardian uses a smart risk-scoring system that evaluates CVSS scores, exploit availability, real-time vendor intelligence, and other factors to guide remediation efforts.

  • Lightweight Scanning: A resource-efficient CLI tool is available for vulnerability assessments. It runs without requiring daemon processes or privileged access, minimizing system overhead while collecting critical system and package data.

  • Comprehensive Reporting: Guardian supports detailed reporting for individual assets and overall system security, assisting teams in tracking trends, allocating resources, and preparing documentation for audits.

  • Broad Linux Support: It is compatible with multiple Linux distributions, including RHEL, CentOS, AlmaLinux, Ubuntu, and Debian, ensuring versatility across different environments.

OpenSCAP

OpenSCAP is an open-source framework aimed at implementing Security Content Automation Protocols (SCAP). It provides a suite of tools for automating compliance checks, vulnerability scanning, and policy enforcement.

OpenSCAP’s strengths include:

  • Extensive support for SCAP standards

  • Compatibility with various security policies

  • Open-source community support

  • Robust documentation and extensibility

However, OpenSCAP is known for higher resource demands, especially when deployed across large environments. Furthermore, OpenSCAP can run into out-of-memory situations that cause the evaluation to stop somewhere in the middle or even crash depending on the distribution or library version.

OpenSCAP is used in many Open Source and commercial solutions.

Resource Usage Comparison

To better understand the differences between Guardian and OpenSCAP, we analyzed their resource usage across various operating systems, focusing on time (in seconds) and memory usage (in kilobytes). Here’s a summary of the findings:

In the table and the chart lower is better.

OS Tool Time (s) Memory (KB)
CentOS 6 OpenSCAP 0.7 35,240
  Guardian 0.5 16,384
Debian 11 OpenSCAP 140 915,144
  Guardian 5.7 213,280
RedHat 9.4 OpenSCAP 1.52 158,484
  Guardian 1.1 50,060
Ubuntu 22.04 OpenSCAP 4.78 128,180
  Guardian 0.91 45,304
SUSE 15 OpenSCAP 7.0 835,188
  Guardian 5.9 274,152

 

comparison - lower is better

Key Takeaways from the Data

  1. Time Efficiency: Across all operating systems, Guardian consistently outperformed OpenSCAP in terms of execution time. For example, on Debian 11, Guardian completed its operations in just 5.7 seconds compared to OpenSCAP’s 140 seconds—a significant improvement.

  2. Memory Efficiency: Guardian’s memory usage was substantially lower than OpenSCAP’s. On SUSE 15, Guardian used only 274,152 KB of memory, compared to OpenSCAP’s 835,188 KB—a difference that can translate into major resource savings in environments with multiple instances.

  3. Scalability Impact: As the number of systems running compliance checks increases, the resource savings from using Guardian compound, making it a more scalable solution for large-scale deployments.

The overall performance and resource improvements of Guardian compared to OpenSCAP are:

  • Time Improvement: 90.84

time-comp

  • Memory Improvement: 71.09%

mem-comp

Guardian significantly outperforms OpenSCAP in both execution time and memory efficiency.

Why Choose Guardian?

Efficient Resource Usage
Guardian’s lightweight design ensures minimal impact on system performance during vulnerability scans. Its unprivileged CLI tool operates without requiring a daemon, making it ideal for environments where resources are shared across multiple applications or virtual machines.

Streamlined Integration
Guardian seamlessly integrates into existing workflows, supporting agile and DevOps methodologies. Its compatibility with TuxCare’s patching solutions ensures automatic identification of deployed patches, simplifying the vulnerability management process for modern IT environments.

Actionable Insights in Real-Time
Guardian goes beyond traditional periodic scans by providing up-to-date visibility into vulnerabilities. Its AI-driven risk scoring and real-time threat intelligence help organizations respond more effectively to potential risks, minimizing the window of exposure.

Scalability for Enterprise Environments
Designed to handle environments with hundreds or thousands of systems, Guardian’s efficient architecture ensures low resource overhead. This scalability allows organizations to maintain consistent performance as their infrastructure expands.

Is OpenSCAP Still Relevant?

OpenSCAP remains a valuable tool for organizations needing to adhere strictly to SCAP standards or those that benefit from its open-source nature. However, its higher resource demands and slower execution times may limit its effectiveness in environments with stringent performance requirements.

Conclusion

While both Guardian and OpenSCAP offer robust compliance and security functionalities, the choice between them depends on your specific needs. Guardian excels in environments where resource efficiency, scalability, and real-time insights are priorities. On the other hand, OpenSCAP’s extensive support for SCAP standards makes it a strong contender for organizations deeply embedded in those protocols.

For modern, agile, and scalable environments, Guardian is the clear winner, offering a lightweight, efficient, and future-ready solution.

Guardian is available in the Google Marketplace